ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE
Efficacy and Safety of Ixabepilone in Metastatic Breast Cancer After Multiple Treatments: Analysis Based on Real-World Data
Received Date : 14 Feb 2024
Accepted Date : 23 May 2024
Available Online : 04 Jun 2024
Goncagül AKDAĞa, Özkan ALANb, Akif DOĞANa, Sedat YILDIRIMa, Oğuzcan KINIKOĞLUa,
Nargiz MAJIDOVAc, İbrahim Vedat BAYOĞLUc, Caner KAPARd, Eda ERÇİNe,
Zeynep ALACA TOPÇUf, Murad GULIYEVg, Deniz IŞIKa, Özlem Nuray SEVERa,
Hatice ODABAŞa, Mahmut Emre YILDIRIMa, Nedim TURANa
aUniversity of Health Science Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital, Division of Medical Oncology, İstanbul, Türkiye
bKoç University Faculty of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, İstanbul, Türkiye
cMarmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Division of Medical Oncology, İstanbul, Türkiye
dBakırköy Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Medical Oncology, İstanbul, Türkiye
eÜmraniye Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Medical Oncology, İstanbul, Türkiye
fMedeniyet University Faculty of Medicine, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Division of Medical Oncology, İstanbul, Türkiye
gİstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, İstanbul, Türkiye
Doi: 10.37047/jos.2024-102164 - Article's Language: EN
Journal of Oncological Sciences. 2024;10(2):89-96.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with a history of treatment with anthracyclines and taxanes exhibit improvement
with ixabepilone, a semi-synthetic analog of epothilone B. The present study, therefore, aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness
of ixabepilone in patients with MBC who have previously received multiple lines of treatment Material and Methods: Patients with MBC
who were treated with ixabepilone were included in the present study, which was designed as a retrospective multicenter analysis. Radiological
responses were evaluated based on the RECIST criteria, and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated. The Common
Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 was adopted to evaluate adverse events. Results: The analysis of 34 patients revealed
a median OS of 10.0 months, a median PFS of 4.2 months, and an objective response rate (ORR) of 28%.The patients treated with ixabepilone
prior to the fifth line of treatment exhibited a significantly better response (ORR 50%). In the subgroup analysis based on receptor status, ER+
and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2+) patients presented the longest median PFS of 6.2 months. Conclusion: Ixabepilone
demonstrated effectiveness in patients with MBC who had received multiple lines of treatments previously. The results suggest that early treatment
regimens or targeted therapy for HER2+ patients could lead to better therapeutic outcomes when ixabepilone is administered. Ixabepilone
is, therefore, a viable option for MBC patients who have received extensive treatment previously while maintaining a good performance status.
Keywords: Ixabepilone; metastatic breast cancer; overall survival; progression-free survival
REFERENCES
- Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229-263. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Dawood S, Broglio K, Ensor J, Hortobagyi GN, Giordano SH. Survival differences among women with de novo stage IV and relapsed breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(11):2169-2174. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Ibrahim NK. Ixabepilone development across the breast cancer continuum: a paradigm shift. Cancer Manag Res. Jun 2010;2:169-79. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Cortes J, Baselga J. Targeting the microtubules in breast cancer beyond taxanes: the epothilones. Oncologist. 2007;12(3):271-280. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Lee FY, Borzilleri R, Fairchild CR, et al. BMS-247550: a novel epothilone analog with a mode of action similar to paclitaxel but possessing superior antitumor efficacy. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7(5):1429-1437. [PubMed]
- Low JA, Wedam SB, Lee JJ, et al. Phase II clinical trial of ixabepilone (BMS-247550), an epothilone B analog, in metastatic and locally advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(12):2726-2734. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Thomas E, Tabernero J, Fornier M, et al. Phase II clinical trial of ixabepilone (BMS-247550), an epothilone B analog, in patients with taxane-resistant metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(23):3399-3406. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Thomas ES, Gomez HL, Li RK, et al. Ixabepilone plus capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer progressing after anthracycline and taxane treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(33):5210-5217. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sparano JA, Vrdoljak E, Rixe O, et al. Randomized phase III trial of ixabepilone plus capecitabine versus capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(20):3256-3263. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228-247. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Freites-Martinez A, Santana N, Arias-Santiago S, Viera A. Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE - Version 5.0) to Evaluate the Severity of Adverse Events of Anticancer Therapies. Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed). 2021;112(1):90-92. English, Spanish. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rivera E, Lee J, Davies A. Clinical development of ixabepilone and other epothilones in patients with advanced solid tumors. Oncologist. 2008;13(12):1207-1223. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Perez EA, Lerzo G, Pivot X, et al. Efficacy and safety of ixabepilone (BMS-247550) in a phase II study of patients with advanced breast cancer resistant to an anthracycline, a taxane, and capecitabine. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(23):3407-3414. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gündüz Ş, Güven DC, Aksoy S, et al. Ixabepilone in metastatic breast cancer: real-world experience. Journal of Oncological Sciences. 2021;7(3)85-90. [Crossref]
- Moulder S, Li H, Wang M, et al. A phase II trial of trastuzumab plus weekly ixabepilone and carboplatin in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;119(3):663-671. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Tolaney SM, Najita J, Sperinde J, et al. A phase II study of ixabepilone and trastuzumab for metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(7):1841-1847. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Rugo HS, Roche H, Thomas E, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Ixabepilone and Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Triple-negative Breast Cancer: a Pooled Analysis From Two Large Phase III, Randomized Clinical Trials. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018;18(6):489-497. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Cardoso F, Bedard PL, Winer EP, et al; ESO-MBC Task Force. International guidelines for management of metastatic breast cancer: combination vs sequential single-agent chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(17):1174-1181. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
- Miles D, von Minckwitz G, Seidman AD. Combination versus sequential single-agent therapy in metastatic breast cancer. Oncologist. 2002;7 Suppl 6:13-9. Erratum in: Oncologist. 2003;8(1):127. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Cardoso F, Spence D, Mertz S, et al. Global analysis of advanced/metastatic breast cancer: Decade report (2005-2015). Breast. Jun 2018;39:131-138. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Roché H, Yelle L, Cognetti F, et al. Phase II clinical trial of ixabepilone (BMS-247550), an epothilone B analog, as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(23):3415-3420. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Aogi K, Rai Y, Ito Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of ixabepilone in taxane-resistant patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines: results of a phase II study in Japan. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;71(6):1427-1433. [Crossref] [PubMed]