The Reallife Comparison of FOLFIRINOX vs Gemcitabine Platinum Combination as a First-Line Treatment in Patients with Pancreatic Carcinoma
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original research article
VOLUME: 10 ISSUE: 1
P: 32 - 38
2024

The Reallife Comparison of FOLFIRINOX vs Gemcitabine Platinum Combination as a First-Line Treatment in Patients with Pancreatic Carcinoma

J Oncol Sci 2024;10(1):32-38
1. Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 2023-11-23
Accepted Date: 2024-02-08
Online Date: 2024-02-26
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Objective: The vast majority of pancreatic carcinoma patients have unresectable or metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Therefore, the 5-year survival rate is approximately 10%. FOLFIRINOX is used as a standard first-line therapy in patients with good performance status and as a single agent for patients with poor performance. Our study aimed to compare the combination of FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus platinum-based therapy in the first-line treatment of unresectable metastatic pancreatic cancer. Material and Methods: Patients diagnosed with locally unresectable and metastatic pancreatic cancer at Gazi University Hospital between 01.2012 and 01.2020 were retrospectively screened. Results: The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) did not significantly differ between the FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus platinum groups (p=0.22 and p=0.192, respectively). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the disease control rate (DCR) between the FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus platinum groups (78.6% vs. 73.1%, respectively; p=0.64). The incidence of neutropenia fever and allgrade mucositis, diarrhea, and neuropathy was significantly greater in the FOLFIRINOX group (p=0.036, p=0.021, p=0.009, p=0.021, respectively). However, there were no significant differences in the incidence of Grade 3-4 side effects, interruption due to side effects, or treatment discontinuation (p=0.60, p=0.33, p=0.8, respectively). Conclusion: Although there was an improvement in OS of 4 months in favor of FOLFIRINOX, no statistically significant difference was found in the median OS, PFS, or DCR between patients treated with gemcitabine and patients treated with platinum agents.

Keywords:
Pancreatic cancer, matastatic, overall survival, adverse events, chemotherapy, performance status

References

1
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):7-30.
2
Mizrahi JD, Surana R, Valle JW, Shroff RT. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2020;395(10242):2008-2020.
3
Burris HA 3rd, Moore MJ, Andersen J, et al. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(6):2403-2413. Corrected and republished in: J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(36):5482-5492.
4
Louvet C, Labianca R, Hammel P, et al; GERCOR; GISCAD. Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(15):3509-3516.
5
Casper ES, Green MR, Kelsen DP, et al. Phase II trial of gemcitabine (2,2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Invest New Drugs. 1994;12(1):29-34.
6
Heinemann V, Quietzsch D, Gieseler F, et al. Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(24):3946-3952.
7
Conroy T, Paillot B, François E, et al. Irinotecan plus oxaliplatin and leucovorin-modulated fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer--a Groupe Tumeurs Digestives of the Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(6):1228-1236.
8
Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al; Groupe Tumeurs Digestives of Unicancer; PRODIGE Intergroup. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(19):1817-1825.
9
Ducreux M, Cuhna AS, Caramella C, et al; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015;26 Suppl 5:v56-68. Erratum in: Ann Oncol. 2017;28(suppl_4):iv167-iv168.
10
Ciliberto D, Botta C, Correale P, et al. Role of gemcitabine-based combination therapy in the management of advanced pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(3):593-603.
11
Von Hoff DD, Ervin TJ, Arena FP, et al. Results of a randomized phase III trial (MPACT) of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone for patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with PET and CA19-9 correlates. American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2013;31:4005.
12
Wang Y, Camateros P, Cheung WY. A Real-World Comparison of FOLFIRINOX, Gemcitabine Plus nab-Paclitaxel, and gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancers. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2019;50(1):62-68.
13
Quan Q, Wang Y, Wang F, et al. Real world first-line treatments and outcomes of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, mFOLFIRINOX and GEMOX in unresectable pancreatic cancer from a Chinese Single Institution. Curr Oncol. 2020;28(1):209-219.
14
Chan KKW, Guo H, Cheng S, et al. Real-world outcomes of FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in advanced pancreatic cancer: a population-based propensity score-weighted analysis. Cancer Med. 2020;9(1):160-169.
15
Kayahan N, Karaca M, Satış H, Yapar D, Özet A. Folfirinox versus gemcitabine-cisplatin combination as first-line therapy in treatment of pancreaticobiliary cancer. Turk J Med Sci. 2021;51(4):1727-1732.
16
Caglevic C, Mahave M, Sanhueza C, Ubillos L. Current systemic treatment options for metastatic and unresectable pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic Cancer. IntechOpen; 2020.